GKB
|
William
Robertson Smith:
|
| Bibliography | |
This thesis examines a formative period of William Robertson Smiths life, from his entry in 1866 to New College, Edinburgh, as a theological student, until 1881, when he became joint editor of the Encyclopaedia Britannica following his deposition from the chair of Hebrew and Old Testament Literature at Aberdeen Free Church College. A main aim of the thesis has been to illustrate how closely Smiths early education at his fathers hand meshed with the influence of his subsequent academic mentors, resulting in a life-long commitment to apply the scientific method to his theological and biblical studies.
The opening chapters focus upon the significant impact of Smiths interest in science and mathematics and in particular upon the consequences of his close association at Edinburgh with Peter Guthrie Tait, professor of Natural Philosophy at Edinburgh University. Smiths student writings, particularly on prophecy, are then examined for the light they shed on his subsequent work as well as for the subtle influence exerted on the psychological aspects of that work through his earlier training under Alexander Bain at Aberdeen University.
Robertson Smiths brief verbal duel with John Tyndall in 1874 is recounted for its relevance to the vigorous and often fierce debate between science and theology which so characterised the period. A similar level of controversy is found within both those respective fields between traditionalists and liberals, illustrated here by reference, amongst many others, to the writings of Matthew Arnold, Ruskin, Huxley and Mark Pattison. Smiths emergence as a significant protagonist is marked by his first contributions, in 1875, to the ninth edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica. The radical and unsettling nature of those critical essays brought immediate accusations of heresy, leading to his protracted trial at the hands of the Free Church of Scotland.
To the end of his short life, Robertson Smith retained the clear imprint of his evangelical upbringing, yet he was progressively influenced by his dedication to the scientific method as applied to biblical criticism; by his acceptance of an evolutionary concept of human and religious development; by his unrivalled knowledge of Continental criticism (particularly in the work of Julius Wellhausen and Abraham Kuenen); and, much more indirectly, by his reading of the Positivist writers of his day particularly John Stuart Mill, G.H. Lewes and Herbert Spencer. Smiths writings are analysed in terms of those factors and are contrasted with the views of leading contemporary figures including George Eliot and John Morley in an effort to identify Smiths unique contribution.
Finally, the complex roots of Robertson Smiths temperament and in particular his reputation as a controversialist are assessed against the circumstances of his early upbringing, and the relevance of psychoanalytic theory is examined in the light of Freuds explicitly expressed debt to Smiths ideas. Similarly, in the style of Michel Foucault, Smith may be seen, less as an enigmatic or anomalous figure of his day, than as a writer whose discourse was as unconsciously subversive of the religious dogma and doctrine of his day as had been the proclamations of the prophets of Israel.
I am grateful to all those who gave advice and assistance in the writing of this thesis. Library staff have been unfailingly co-operative, not only at the Queen Mother Library of Aberdeen University but also at the Manuscripts Departments of Cambridge University Library, the British Library and the Beinecke Library, Yale, all of whom efficiently supplied photocopies of relevant material.
Amongst those who responded readily to my requests for advice or practical help, I am grateful to Prof. Rob Archbold and Dr Peter Lees, both of whom offered helpful comments on quaternions and nabla, to Rabbi Lionel Shrago, to whom I turned for information on the early Jewish community in Aberdeen, and to Mr David Gadsby of Messrs A. and C. Black, who gladly gave me anecdotal information on the firms association with the Encyclopaedia Britannica. In addition, I owe a particular debt to Dr Francesca Murphy of Aberdeen University, whose sound advice I heeded less often than it deserved; to my two sons, who frequently counselled me, with filial patience, on computing matters; to Barbara Rae, who assisted me in solving all my word-processing difficulties with great forbearance; and to Dr Robert Segal of Lancaster University, whose enthusiasm and practical assistance proved of immense value at the outset.
Two people above all deserve heartfelt thanks: my supervisor, Professor William Johnstone, whose gentle guidance enabled me to acquire a rudimentary understanding of Hebrew and whose incomparable knowledge of Pentateuchal criticism has been inspirational; and my wife, Martha, who patiently read (and re-read) each chapter in draft and whose good sense unerringly detected numerous obscurities and solecisms. The many imperfections and shortcomings which remain are my own.
Note: Unless otherwise indicated, references to all MS correspondence to and from WRS are to letters contained in the Cambridge University Library Collections Add. Mss 7449. In those instances, only the specific reference number within that collection is cited. Material drawn from manuscript memoirs are from CUL Add. Mss 7476 and are so indicated in the footnotes.